Capitolized is a twice-weekly digest that keeps an eye on the representatives you voted for (or against) with expert reporting, analysis and insight from the editors and reporters of Montana Free Press. Want to see Capitolized in your inbox every Tuesday and Friday? Sign up here.
March 17, 2023
In the past two days, several parliamentary motions have been introduced to reassign significant legislative matters to different committees. The outcomes of these motions have varied.
In the Senate Thursday, Majority Leader Steve Fitzpatrick, R-Great Falls, moved to re-refer Box Elder Rep. Jonathan Windy Boy’s House Bill 317 — better known as the Indian Child Welfare Act — from the Senate Judiciary Committee to the Senate Public Health, Welfare and Safety Committee without objection. And in a later motion, he moved to re-refer House Bill 234, a bill banning dissemination of materials deemed obscene in public schools sponsored by Rep. Bob Phalen, R-Lindsay, from the Senate Education Committee to the Senate Judiciary Committee. That motion failed 18-32, with many Republicans voting “no” along with Democrats.
“You heard the word ‘laws’ in the short title [of HB 234],” Senate Judiciary Committee chair Keith Regier, R-Kalispell, said in support of the motion. “That’s what judiciary deals with. A lot of laws there. I think it’s a good move.”
“We consider laws all the time,” added Sen. Steve Hinebauch, R-Wibaux.
HB 234 — titled “Revise dissemination of obscene materials to minors laws” — would criminalize public school employees who distribute material that meets the state’s definition of “obscene” to minors. Republican supporters of the bill often accompanied their arguments on the floor with references to the graphic novel-memoir “Gender Queer,” the subject of a nationwide book-banning effort in school libraries.
Those who were against the motion to re-refer the bill argued that it should be sent to the education committee instead.
“Education bill, school libraries, we’re happy to hear it,” said Senate Education Committee Chair Dan Salomon, R-Ronan.
Fitzpatrick, despite making the motion, was among the “no” votes, as was Senate President Jason Ellsworth, R-Hamilton. Fitzpatrick said he made the motion at the request of Phalen, the bill’s sponsor. The request to re-refer HB 317 came from the minority party, he added.
“I find myself performing those actions quite frequently. It becomes somewhat more effortless if I simply take care of it,” Fitzpatrick informed Capitolized. “Individuals approach me, seeking to reevaluate a bill, and I oblige them out of courtesy.”
The Senate president holds the ultimate authority over committee assignments for bills in the Senate, taking into consideration input from other members of leadership. On the other hand, the House utilizes an appendix that provides guidance on the appropriate placement of bills according to their subject matter. However, leadership in the House still maintains flexibility in interpreting and applying this guidance.
According to Fitzpatrick, we are generally open to accommodating individuals on most of these, as long as it remains within the overall subject matter.
The allocation of tasks to individuals named Bill is frequently driven by political factors as well. The personal political beliefs of the chairs and members of committees can have an impact, and certain committees, particularly those involved in the judiciary process, can be utilized to either advance or eliminate legislation that may be deemed controversial.
To illustrate: HB 234, a bill carried by Freedom Caucus member Phalen, passed the House despite 14 Republican defections. Regier, the Senate Judiciary Committee chair, is an overt hardliner. Salomon, the Senate Education Committee chair, is well-known as comparatively moderate. The bill might fare better before Regier’s committee. HB 317, similarly, passed the House with unanimous support from Democrats and a 33-35 split in the GOP.
Another example is Senate Bill 99, a bill banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth sponsored by Sen. John Fuller, R-Kalispell. That bill passed the Senate and was assigned to the House Judiciary Committee, which is chaired by Rep. Amy Regier, R-Kalispell, Keith Regier’s daughter and sister of House Speaker Matt Regier, R-Kalispell.
On Friday, House Minority Leader Kim Abbott, D-Helena, moved to re-refer the bill out of the Judiciary Committee and to the House Human Services Committee. On paper, there are more Republicans who might be amenable to voting against the bill in Human Services than there are in Judiciary, including Rep. Gregory Frazer, R-Deer Lodge, a consistent “no” vote on his party’s LGBTQ-related legislation.
Abbott stated that Senate Bill 99 specifically focuses on health care and the manner in which health care providers in the state offer their services. He pointed out that based on the appendix of our rules, it should have been directed towards the Human Services Committee.
The motion to re-refer ultimately failed to pass with a vote of 33-63, as three Republicans deviated from party lines.
—Arren Kimbel-Sannit
Bill Report
House Bill 445, sponsored by Rep. Melissa Romano, D-Helena, narrowly passed an initial vote on the House floor Thursday, 53-47. The bill allocates $1 million to the Office of the Commissioner of Higher Education to establish a statewide mentorship program for starting teachers in K-12 public schools. Romano argued HB 445 would help improve educator retention, particularly in rural districts that currently lose roughly one-fifth to one-fourth of their teaching staff each year — “more than double the national attrition rate,” she added. Several Republicans spoke against the bill out of concern that, in light of ongoing disagreements about authority over higher education policy, the money might not be used by OCHE as intended. However, 21 Republican lawmakers sided with the full House Democratic caucus to advance the proposal, with Rep. Lee Deming, R-Laurel, attributing his support to the success of a local mentorship program at a school in his district.
Senate Bill 458, a bill to define sex based on how a person’s reproductive system functions, passed out of the Senate chamber Friday on a 28-22 vote, despite briefly seeing a much closer margin due to fleeting Republican opposition. Proponents cast the bill as an attempt to clarify the definition of sex in light of public mainstreaming of “gender fluidity, gender transition, gender expression, transgenderism,” as the bill’s sponsor, Sen. Carl Glimm, R-Kila, argued during a Thursday floor debate. Opponents say the bill would strip legal recognition from transgender people and many people with intersex conditions, linking it to a continued tide of anti-trans and LGBTQ+ bills nationwide. It will now proceed to the House.
Vote Viz
Several Republicans joined with Democrats in opposition to Senate Bill 458, which nonetheless passed the upper chamber on third reading Friday, 28-22.
Heard in the Halls
“We are growing government, but in a good way.”
—Rep. Jane Gillette, R-Bozeman, explaining her support for House Bill 2 on Wednesday. The $13.4 billion budget bill passed out of the House Appropriations Committee on party lines this week, with Democrats opposing the spending plan based on their assessment that it doesn’t fund enough services for the working class and elderly. “I don’t see some of the major priorities of my constituents in this,” said Rep. Emma Kerr-Carpenter, D-Billings.
On Background
House rules, including the committee assignment appendix
Reading Between the Lines: For more on the book-banning debate in Montana, see this story from the Flathead Beacon.
Lawmakers eye deep changes to K-12 education: For more on big potential changes to the education system that lawmakers are eyeing this year, see this story. (MTFP)
